The huge expectation continues Spider-Man: No Way Home about the possible appearance of Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield in Spider-Man: No Way Home. The possibility that both actors will reprise their respective versions of Peter Parker is something that definitely excites many, and the rumors that continually leak do not help.
Nor does the ambiguous Watch Spider-Man: No Way Home streaming the full movie Free online on that some actors have made over the past year help. Especially Andrew Garfield who, while tired of denying his appearance in the movie, also has a curious ability to give ambiguous answers.
Also, following confirmation from some of the actors and characters from past Spider-Man movies, including Alfred Molina as Doctor Octopus, Jamie Foxx as Electro, and Willem Dafoe as Green Goblin, it would be rare for other versions of Peter Parker to other universes, did not appear.
To put it in perspective, with the numbers of the Christmas weekend, the film of the spider superhero surpassed the barrier of one billion dollars raised worldwide. And that is a brand that implies the following records.
All of the above is relevant considering the status of the Omicron variant in the United States and other parts of the world.
To date, the film has grossed $ 467 million in the United States, while in the rest of the world it has grossed another $ 587 million. In total they are more than $ 1,054 million dollars worldwide. The most relevant of all? It is not even released yet in China and Japan, two markets that will increase the numbers significantly.
He has commented on it during an interview with GQ magazine. Spider-Man: No Way Home In it he explains, again, that the supposed leaked video of him on the set of Spider-Man: No Way Home is "a photoshop", meaning that, in reality, it is a digital manipulation.
He then said "look, at this point, I don't have much more to say, let's know if I'm in the movie or not when it opens." Which is the most ambiguous answer the actor has given so far. Is he tired of being asked the same question all the time, or is he starting to blurt out the truth?.
At first it was doubted if the scene was real, a person published a video demonstrating that it was a manipulation using artificial intelligence to create a Garfield deep fake. But it turns out that that was also a lie and a group of experts in digital effects have practically confirmed that it is a real scene. On one thing we do agree with Garfield: we will find out if he appears in Spider-Man: No Way Home on December 16, when the film opens in theaters around the world.
Tom Hardy hasn't spent a lot of time in the MCU. He was expected, so he has been polite and has been there, half drunk, but he is not going to stay in the MCU. Another thing is Venom.
The post-credits for Spider-Man: No way home, which link directly to the post-credits for Venom 2: There Will Be Carnage, are quite eloquent: Venom will be incorporated into the films that are part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, from which all films are excluded. Sony's that don't have Spider-Man as the lead, but Tom Hardy, the Eddie Brock incarnation of Hardy, I mean, doesn't make the jump to the MCU. It is, in truth, a smart move on the part of Marvel Studios.
The tone of the Venom films (make no doubt that Venom 3 is going to be in the same vein as the two previous films), as well as the tone they have given Morbius and the one they are going to give him. to Kraven's film, as well as to the rest of the films that are chaining (Silver Sable, Madame Web, Nightwatch, Black Cat it has nothing to do with the tone of the 'official' Marvel films at Disney.
It is not that they are darker, which they are, but that they are a totally different product: they are a reinterpretation of the action films of the eighties and nineties for a new audience in which it turns out that Marvel characters appear who are more antiheroes than heroes. It is a significant nuance.
They are films designed for the public that likes the Fast & Furious saga, not necessarily a fan of superhero movies (which they obviously attract) and that can be dropped by a movie in which two aliens are having cakes. Yes, all very 80s, things as they are. And the best part is that Marvel has an ace up its sleeve: if one day it wants Tom Hardy to also appear as the Eddie Brock of the MCU.
It can incorporate Hardy in the form of a variant, like JK Simmons and his J. Jonah Jameson and so many friends. But he would not be the same character, even if he had the same name. And, for now, he doesn't need you. Because the piece of Venom that has remained in the MCU can perfectly end in Peter Parker.
The post-credit scene in which Tom Hardy appears drunk lost trying to understand what has happened in the official Marvel timeline is a master move by Marvel Studios that he defends with great irony. The summary that the waiter (Cristo Fernández, the actor who gives life to Dani Rojas in the Ted Lasso series) makes Eddie Brock is significant.
Sold like this, as a purple alien who decimated the world population and who was defeated by a group of superheroes, it is too much to digest for the character of Tom Hardy and, deep down, for the general public who neither likes nor does the superhero subgenre. The scene is a metaphor for the Marvel character films at Sony.
they are infinitely simpler films and infinitely less ambitious than the MCU titles. That Venom and Morbius exist, does not mean that they have to see their faces, nor that their respective films have to lead to a satisfactory resolution in which the arcs of their characters converge. They simply have to entertain by repeating a formula over and over again.